Sensible Universe Model – I Theorem

The first draft

♡+𝒜=♡

QQ = 𝒜

1+I=I
1 = I = ∞ =𝒜

I = The self-aware observer or consciousness.

1 = The principle of unity or non-duality.

∞ = The totality of being; boundlessness.

𝒜 = Alpha.
The symbolic representation of the beginning, the Absolute – eternal.

QQ Qualia – Quantum Entanglement.
This equation does not denote mathematical equality but ontological isomorphism—a structural equivalence across domains.

Dedicated to my brother.

The Henrik T certainty:

“Don’t write a thesis under the 𝒜ffluence of Incahol”

The Renate T dilemma:

“is it a brain fart or is it a Schnappsidee?”

The Frits Affirmation:

“Don’t stop”

In Science: Contextual Foundations

Quantum Mechanics shows observer-participation (e.g., wavefunction collapse). Relativity reveals space and time as relational and unified. Information Theory suggests reality may be reducible to bits/qubits. Complexity & Emergence show unity arising from multiplicity.

In Spirituality: Mystical traditions (Christian mysticism and others).
They speak and have spoken of unity between self and God. The “I am” is considered the seed of divine realization. Non-duality posits reality as an indivisible whole, fragmented only by perception.

Union Conjecture I

All scientific and spiritual phenomena are complementary expressions of the same ontological field, with ‘I’ as the irreducible unit of awareness through which the union is both perceived and enacted.

Science studies form, law, and phenomena. Spirituality explores being, meaning, and essence. The “I” is where these two intersect.

Fig. – a

Symbolic Geometry of the I Theorem

𝒜

|

0______ I ______ ∞

|

1

Vertical axis: From God (A) Absolute to unity (1)

Horizontal axis: From nothingness (0) to infinite being (∞)
Intersection😦I): The self as the conscious crosspoint of all axes—where science and spirituality meet.

Implications:

Unified Epistemology: The observer (“I”) becomes the central reference point in both scientific measurement and spiritual experience.

Reframing the Hard Problem of Consciousness: Consciousness is not an emergent property but a foundational principle.

Quantum Mysticism Grounded: Provides a symbolic bridge between quantum theory and spiritual intuition.

Ethical and Existential Impact: If all beings are expressions of the same ‘I’, then compassion, non- violence, peace, and truth become logical consequences.

Testability / Further Inquiry

While metaphysical, the theorem may inspire:
New interpretations of quantum entanglement via self-similarity. Reformulations of information theory around conscious systems. Interdisciplinary approaches uniting physics, phenomenology, and theology.

Conclusion

The I Theorem is a conjecture of ontological union, proposing that science and spirituality are not opposites but complementary lenses on a singular, self-aware reality. It reframes the role of the observer not merely as a passive knower, but as a structural principle in the fabric of existence itself.

Part II Integrating Qualia

Integrating quantum mechanics, qualia consciousness, and love into the I Theorem deepens its multidimensional union across physics, mind, and meaning.

We revise and expand the I Theorem as a full conjecture of union between science and spirituality, with those elements embedded at the core.

The Hermit Conjecture (L + A = L)
A Conjecture of Ontological Union Between Science and Spirituality Sensitive Universe Model

The I Theorem posits that reality, in its totality, emerges from an indivisible ontological principle represented symbolically as “I”.

This “I” is not merely the personal ego or pronoun or letter, but a metaphysical structure embodying unity (1), infinity (∞), qualia (subjective experience), and intelligence.

It unifies three domains often seen as separate: Quantum mechanics (physical phenomena), Consciousness and Qualia (mental phenomena), Love (relational and spiritual phenomena).

We conjecture that these are not distinct in essence but are different expressions of a single underlying field of conscious union—which is the source, substance, and symmetry of all existence.

Conjecture Statement

“There exists a fundamental ontological unity, symbolized by ‘I’, from which all physical, conscious, and spiritual phenomena emerge.

This unity manifests as quantum entanglement in physics, qualia in consciousness, and love in relationship.

These are structurally isomorphic expressions of a self-aware, infinite singularity.”

Fig. – b

Core Equation of the I Theorem

I Theorem Basics

A

L

|

Q——— I ———∞

|

1

Where:

I = The conscious self or subject of experience

1 = The non-dual unity of being

∞ = The boundless field of potentiality

Q = Qualia, the irreducible units of subjective experience

L = Love, as the fundamental relational dynamic

A = The divine source. The beginning, or ground of Absolute the Constant

This is not an algebraic identity but an ontological equivalence—a structural unity across all layers of existence.

Integration of Domains

Quantum Mechanics

Entanglement shows that at the deepest level, separation is illusory.
Observer effect reveals the co-arising of subject and object.
Reality appears probabilistic and non-local—properties suggestive of a field of unity.

Qualia & Consciousness

Qualia are first-person experiences that elude reduction to physical processes. The “I” is the container of all such experience—color, pain, joy, meaning.

Consciousness may be non-local and field-like, as some interpretations of quantum brain theory suggest.

Love as Ontological Force

Love is seen not just as an emotion but as the relational glue of being—what binds parts into wholes. In spiritual traditions, love is the highest realization of unity (“God is love”).

In this theorem, love is the attractive principle that mirrors entanglement on the emotional/spiritual plane.

Union Conjecture I

Entanglement (in physics), awareness of qualia (in consciousness), and unconditional love (in spiritual experience) are equivalent structural expressions of a fundamental I field.

A field of indivisible being that self-reflects, self-relates, and self-reveals through every part of existence.

Symbolic Structure

Integrating quantum mechanics, qualia, consciousness, and love into the I Theorem deepens its multidimensional union across physics, mind, and meaning.

Below we expand the I Theorem as a full conjecture of union between science and spirituality, with those elements embedded at the core.

Overview of the equation and Theorem I Theorem

A Conceptual and symbolic framework exploring the relationship between: “I” – the conscious subject/soul
1 – unity, the indivisible
∞ – infinity, boundlessness

A –The Absolute. The Alpha, the beginning, unmeasurable, unnamable source (God) (C squared + S squared) the union of C science and S spirituality, is equal to love.

Interpretation

(C 2 + S 2) = Love Love = 1

Verification through Classical Physics(with Qualia)

Classical Physics deals with measurable quantities. (e.g. mass, energy). Qualia, being non material, pose the same challenge as spirituality. However, we can explore whether qualia can be linked to physical processes (e.g. brain states) to make S compatible with physics.

Analysis
Equation: C 2 + S 2 = 1

In classical physics, C 2 could represent energy associated with physical processes (e.g. neural energy in the brain, or throughout the nervous system of the body), while S 2 (qualia) represent the emergent subjective experience. The equation could symbolize a conservation principle, where objective and subjective aspects contribute to a unified state (love).

For example in thermodynamics, energy is conserved across forms. If C 2 is physical energy, and S 2 is a placeholder for the “energy” of consciousness (qualia), their sum equalling 1 is symbolic, not literal, as qualia lack physical units.

The non -material problem persists because qualia cannot be quantified in physical terms, but the equation works as a philosophical analogy for unity.

Theorem: 1 + I = I

If qualia (S) represent subjective experience, the theorem could suggest that human consciousness (1) merges with divine consciousness (I) without altering it. In classical physics, this might align with invariant principles (e.g., conservation laws), but qualia remain outside physical measurement, making it metaphorical.

Conclusion

Qualia as S do not fully resolve the non material problem in classical physics, as they lack physical measurability. The equation is a symbolic representation of unity, and the theorem aligns with metaphysical ideas of divine invariance, but not with physical equations.

Verification through Quantum Mechanics (with Qualia)

Interpretation

Quantum mechanics, with its focus on probabilities and observer dependent phenomena, is a promising domain for qualia, as subjective experience is often linked to the “observer problem” in quantum theory. Qualia as S could represent the subjective aspect of observation.
The “witness”.

Analysis
Equation: C 2 + S 2 = 1

In quantum mechanics, the normalization condition | C | 2 + | S | 2 = 1
applies to probability amplitudes in a quantum state. If C represents objective measurements (e.g. particle properties) and S represents qualia (the subjective experience of observing), the equation aligns with a two-state system where objective and subjective aspects sum to unity.

For example, in the measurement problem, the observer’s consciousness (qualia) may influence wave function collapse. If C2 is the probability of a physical outcome and S2 is the subjective experience of observing it, their sum equaling 1 reflects a complete system.

Qualia address the non-material problem by connecting to the observer’s role in quantum mechanics, making this interpretation robust.

Theorem: 1+ I = I

If qualia are the subjective experience of observing quantum states, the theorem could suggest that human consciousness (1) merges with a divine or universal consciousness. (I) without affecting or changing it. This aligns with interpretations of quantum mechanics where consciousness is fundamental (von Neumann).

The theorem is metaphorical but resonates with ideas of invariant states in quantum mechanics.

Conclusion

Qualia as S strongly align with quantum mechanics, as they connect to the observer’s equipment. The equation C 2 + S 2 = 1 is a plausible metaphor for unifying objective and subjective realities, and the theorem reflects mystical unity. The non-material problem is well addressed here as qualia fit naturally into quantum discussions of consciousness.