Sensible Universe Model – I Theorem

Presentation of The Hermit Conjecture, The I Theorem, and Related Frameworks

The Hermit Conjecture: Love = God (λ), the I Theorem, the Sensible Universe Model (SUM) and the Conflict Resolution Conjecture,
are a multi-disciplinary framework that bridges ontology, quantum physics, philosophy of mind, and mathematics.

At its core, this work proposes a unified model linking Consciousness, Qualia, and Quantum Entanglement:

    𝒬 ⊗ 𝒞   —Ent→   𝑰

where:
– 𝒬 = Qualia space (subjective experiential states)
– 𝒞 = Consciousness field (observer-dependent but ontologically grounded)
– Ent = Quantum entanglement as both a physical and informational operator
– 𝑰 = The ontological field described in the I Theorem

This perspective treats qualia not as epiphenomena but as entangled informational structures that exist within and
influence the physical world, potentially measurable in the context of high-dimensional Hilbert spaces.

From this basis, the work unfolds into three interlinked propositions:

1. The Hermit Conjecture
   A philosophical–mathematical hypothesis formalizing the relationship:
       Love = G(λ)
   where G denotes the ontological constant of God, understood as the universal field of unitive resonance.
   This is treated not as a theological claim alone but as a formal symmetry in which Love is the necessary and sufficient
   condition for the realization of G(λ) within 𝑰.

2. The I Theorem
   A set of axioms, including the Central Equation:
       1 + 𝑰 = 𝑰
   expressing the principle that Unity is already encompassed within the Infinite Self (𝑰).
   The theorem is structured as a progressive immersion, mapping the resonance between 𝑰 and the Absolute 𝒜,
   and exploring implications for physics (including string/M-theory integration), information theory, and metaphysics.

3. The Conflict Resolution Conjecture
   A formal model for the dissolution of contradictions, drawing from resonance alignment in the field 𝑰:
       ℜ(Δ) → 0
   where ℜ(Δ) is the residual dissonance function between two conflicting states or perspectives.
   The conjecture proposes that resolution emerges from phase alignment in the ontological domain,
   rather than from compromise in the material domain.

These frameworks interweave mathematics, physics, phenomenology, and art (including music and visual symbolism),
forming a coherent ontological map. The aim is to extend the dialogue on consciousness beyond computationalism,
into a model where information, experience, and being are inseparable.